[Wed,14:11] <Quilnux> @josef You must have a different version of MeshChatX then I do because I don't see it (I don't update all the time like others probably do). Not sure if file

[Wed,14:11] <Quilnux> sharing is the same though as an FTP servers. I'll depend on it's implementation. I noticed filesync is in development though. someone was talking about that in

[Wed,14:11] <Quilnux> this room that I had responded to. So they might have filesync capability soon.

[Wed,14:13] <Quilnux> I don't tend to use stuff that syncs files between machines though because I have 1 desktop and 2 laptops and I don't want to laptops to have the same files as

[Wed,14:13] <Quilnux> my desktop in case they get stolen. So I don't generally use those things. I just selfhost Nextcloud locally and use that over a selfhosted VPN.

[Wed,14:23] <josef> I see.. I do filetransfer once in a month. I was looking forward for options. incase something is going to happen.

[Wed,14:30] <Quilnux> @josef Reticulum just grows more and more each month. New capabilities are always welcome.

[Wed,14:31] <Quilnux> I gotta head out. I just got a brand new Tesla (first I've ever owned) and it's got so many features I need to sit in it and just start touching buttons on the

[Wed,14:31] <Quilnux> screen to see what everything is (it's overwhelming not gonna lie). Have a great rest of your morning/afternoon/evening!

[Wed,14:31] <ObscureB> @Quilnux I've seen two MUD servers on nomadnet so far

[Wed,14:32] <ObscureB> 96e3fe9f897cbe5dfcbd9400e2e41515:/page/index.mu

[Wed,14:34] <ObscureB> I think this is the other one. Though I haven't seen it in a while. 80bccbb9324a2dc5bf7ecc262ac85daf

[Wed,14:36] <Quilnux> @ObscureB Thanks for sharing! I'd prefer a non-nomad version, this will do for now. Thanks for sharing! Great find!

[Wed,14:36] <Quilnux> See you all later!

[Wed,17:53] <welo> the reticulum phantom implementation is kinda ass frankly

[Wed,17:53] <welo> it's just non standard and not really built for reticulum either so it's the worst of both worlds

[Wed,17:54] <welo> I've been looking into adding reticulum support into qBittorrent directly and I've half written up a spec for that, I'm just ass at c++, so if I were to do it,

[Wed,17:54] <welo> it might take me a month.

[Wed,18:02] <welo> hardest part of porting is having an alternative thing in place of trackers.

[Wed,19:07] <welo> okay I looked at the libtorrent thing (library that qbittorrent uses) and bro I am so fucking lost, I have not touched C++ in a very long time and it shows.

[Wed,19:09] <welo> okay I'm gonna go find a go or rust version of a bittorrent client and take a look instead because those are the two languages I'm not braindead at

[Wed,19:10] <welo> would rather just port qBittorrent directly, but a proof of concept is fine.

[Wed,19:11] <welo> someone who is smarter than me can do that if I happen to be onto something

[Wed,19:16] <welo> microReticulum (reticulm's c++ impl) seems pretty good from the people I've heard talk about it. So I reckon it is actually doable

[Wed,20:45] <cykros> Greetings folks. feeling late to the reticulum party but fips wants to insist on systemd and this is feeling more accessible so figure i'll learn my way around

[Wed,20:45] <cykros> here first

[Wed,20:52] <cykros> curious if there's more available than I've run across on Android. Seems like Sideband is good basic stuff but NomadNet and other terminal stuff is basically

[Wed,20:52] <cykros> unusable on a touch screen on a phone without a keyboard.

[Wed,21:16] <Guest> hi people

[Wed,21:20] <Meteo> Meteo Request from Guest: Weather in moscow: 14.9C, Overcast

[Wed,21:20] <System> Guest has joined The Chat Room!

[Wed,21:21] <System> Guest is Laughing Out Loud! LOL! :D

[Wed,21:21] <System> Guest is away.

[Wed,21:21] <Guest> good night anybody

[Thu,00:21] <josef> @cykros sideband is very basic.. there are other apps for the phone

[Thu,00:22] <josef> like meshchat,meshchatx, columba or ratspeak.

[Thu,02:06] <Quilnux> @welo It's been suggested by Mark Qvist that it's likely harder (in most cases) to port to Reticulum vs building apps from the ground up. I believe torrent will

[Thu,02:06] <Quilnux> be one of those cases were a completely new application vs porting because the torrent standard heavily relies on IP to be present and wasn't really designed or

[Thu,02:06] <Quilnux> implemented for cases without IP. IP is basically the foundation of torrent. If you look at how trackers are implemented (for example, which I think you've

[Thu,02:06] <Quilnux> realized since you mentioned it), it cannot be used with anything that is not an IP-based network. And a re-write of the specification for trackers would

[Thu,02:06] <Quilnux> require a complete re-engineering of the torrent protocol and standard. So it wouldn't be compatible with the normal torrent system used on the internet today.

[Thu,02:09] <Quilnux> @welo The better option would be to throw away torrent and build a torrent-like standard instead, and make it purpose built for Reticulum. It won't be torrent

[Thu,02:09] <Quilnux> but if the output (end result) is identical, it doesn't matter if it's torrent or not.

[Thu,02:22] <Quilnux> Have a great night everyone!

[Thu,06:08] <B> 🍕 🧑‍🏫 🧑‍🍳 🧑‍⚕️ 🧑‍🌾

[Thu,06:09] <B> I guess that is what happens when you do the "/e" command, lol

[Thu,06:57] <Guest> regarding torrenting on rns, there is already something. https://github.com/ObunagaLabs/reticulum-phantom-local

[Thu,07:32] <Guest> Testing